Thursday 6 November 2014

#SluggerTalks: Unlocking NI’s potential requires a shift in priorities and resources

On Wednesday Shane Greer and I kicked off the first of what we hope will become a regular trans-Atlantic conversation on the future of Northern Ireland. We will being bringing guests into our next session but the main purpose here was to follow up on his original blog essay.

It’s a tough call. A few years back I did try to get a conversation going on the future of Belfast which was all but subsumed in the misery of the flag protests when Belfast City Council decided to restrict the flying of the Union flag over Belfast’s hallmark building.

So why does Shane think we have tremendous potential? First he cites institutional stability, backed and guaranteed by two sovereign government of the United Kingdom and Ireland. This he argues puts us in far better position than other post conflict societies.

He also goes on to note that the world around us has changed, with regard to the ease with which people can move away and still stay connected with home, which he says goes hand in hand with a globalised world has created new opportunities for people..

That said, as Brandon Hamber noted on Twitter, there’s an underlying stability in the NI population flows which is radically at odds with the drastic outward churn in the younger demographic groups of the Republic.

Even if overall inflows and outflows of population are relatively the small, the motivation for those leaving may have changed. Far fewer are fleeing to avoid the sectarian tensions so much as moving towards opportunity.

One of the controversial issues raised was what exactly do we mean when we say NI has tremendous potential. It’s too easy to resort to the dying metaphors of the Peace Process™ era.
On Facebook one reader offered this off the cuff but concrete thought on the matter:
In a strict economic sense the gap (measure of underperformance) between the actual output/GVA measure and a hypothetical potential measure would be the way to go if the aim is to quantify ‘potential’.
The hypothetical would for example assume NI matches GB productivity performance (note that GB’s performance is nothing special over the long-run).
Sources of the gap are multiple, but institutional structures which impact on the supply-side are crucial. It’s here that political failure may link to economic underperformance.
Another reader emailed Slugger with the following:
The question is what makes a strong modern outward looking economy, and what does NI need to do to get there? In other words what might be the sort of economy that would not only keep young educated people, but also attract more young educated young people and dynamic businesses that have the potential to grow in that outward facing economy?
It is certainly not subsidising back room service jobs in the same way as NI subsidised synthetic fibre production in the 1960s. You can’t buy investment that lasts. JTI pumped millions into Ballymena, but is still moving to another EU country (so regulation is a bit of a distraction as a reason BTW).[emphasis added]
So what’s blocking us politically? Shane argues it is fundamentally a problem of priorities.  He cites that signal issue of #flegs as a primary example of how politicians’ become consumed with near term skirmishing at the expense of long term vision.

So what can practically be done?

The issue is not so much going for wholesale privatisation of publicly owned utilities (governed by a regulatory system which is slowly coming into disrepute) so much as subtly changing the environment, not simply to support business but to encourage entrepreneurship.

Towards the end, we touched on Brian Walker’s question in the comments to Shane’s original post, which ran…
“Having followed the debates for a decade I’m a sceptic about the supposed benefits particularly without a north-south economic development strategy and with a Barnett squeeze all but inevitable .”
That scepticism is no doubt widespread. But worth noting this is not something unknown elsewhere.  The Devolutionaries on BBC Radio Four looked at cities as an organ of regenerationinterviewed Bruce Katz author of The Metropolitan Revolution
When you are trying to build your economy, when you are trying to grow your innovation sector, when you are trying to re-build your core areas it is best for local decision makers to be able to deploy their resources and  powers in advance of their visions rather than looking to central government for permissions or resources.
Our next SluggerTalks video chat will be in a week or two. In the meantime keep an eye out for Shane’s next essay and please do take the opportunity to join the conversation about the future of Northern Ireland.
You can follow the debate on Twitter,  Facebook and at LinkedIn on the Politics and Public Affairs group. You can also email your comments and feedback directly to

1 comment:

  1. Being run out of casinos is an occupational hazard for Grosjean, a professional gambler who majored in utilized math at Harvard and briefly thought-about careers on Wall Street and in academia. The purpose is to get nearer to 21 than the dealer without going over 카지노 사이트 – known as as|often identified as} going bust. The playing cards are valued by the quantity they present, the face playing cards are all worth 10, but the aces may be worth 1 or 11; this is as much as} the player. The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send promoting, or to trace the user on web site|a internet site} or throughout {several|a quantity of} websites for related advertising purposes. American and European roulette is the most common type of this recreation.